Milarepa wrote:Some of us enjoy a little pride in lineage positoning, if only admitting this to ourselves. Lots of us enjoy expereincing the latest, stronger, purer, more effective Reiki. Even more of us want to experience the latest single source white western who has exclusivity to some ellusive Japanese hermit type figure. Or, there's the accepting among us whom eagerly deavour the best marketed 'Japanese' styles, no matter how far away goals seem.
Probably most have been there, somewhere, to some degree, at some point. I know i have many times. I still am, haha! Just what is it that makes so many of us feel the motivation to keep experiencing, keep learning new concepts, ways of interacting, with, ourselves?
I'm really interested in as many views as possible.
Warmest Wishes
Wayne
Hi Wayne
Great questions!
Here is the way I see it.
1) Lineage positioning?- It may just be that your were an "early adopter" and learned Reiki in the early days before there were thousands (millions?) of Reiki Teachers, which means there will be fewer steps back to Usui. A nice place to be but only because it means you will have had more time to practice Reiki!
It may be that you have actively sought out a Reiki Teacher who has a very short lineage. Why might this be? Maybe because you feel in a shorter lineage the Reiki teachings will have been less mixed with non-Reiki add-ins?
- Well it appears that many, if not most, of the add-ins to Reiki teachings, such as chakras, crystal grids, Reiki guides etc. first started to be taught as Reiki very early in the development of Reiki - as early as several (but not all) of Takata's Master Students. So a lineage would have to be very short and exclude certain people to be fairly sure that what you have been taught as Reiki is just Reiki.
Or, maybe because you feel the energetic link with Usui is stronger, and the Reiki you "receive" will be stronger, more powerful?
- Well, I believe that Reiki just is, it doesn't come in different strengths or levels of power, it just has different effects depending on the circumstance and maybe the experience and amount of regular practice of the practitioner. If you meet a Reiki practitioner who has been regularly practicing Reiki for many years you can sense or feel the Reiki emanating from them. However, this does not mean that the Reiki we "receive" from them will be stronger. In fact I don't think we "receive" any Reiki from anyone in terms of the Reiju or Initiation/Attunement. We may "receive" an (increased) awareness of Reiki within us and around us but it is up to us and our regular practice to become more confident and develop our technique so that we can be more effective Reiki practitioners (i.e. become better at staying out of the way and not becoming attached to specifics!).
2) The latest, stronger, purer, more effective Reiki?- Well, yes there are hundreds of new Reiki styles still appearing everywhere but in many cases, the only thing connected to Usui's style of Reiki is that the name of the style has the word 'Reiki' in it! It is part of the (modified by the media, peer pressure etc.) human nature to want the latest, best, purest, most powerful version of something but, as I mentioned above Reiki is Reiki! I don't believe you can get a "New Improved Reiki! Works Twice as Fast as the Old Reiki!". It may be that some people are becoming more sensitive to Reiki and find it easier to emanate this phenomenon but the Reiki is no different. A Reiki practitioner still needs to practice regularly (on self and others) and all the extra symbols and techniques we often find in these newer styles realy just clutter the system and mean that there is more for the practitioner to learn, remember and worry about getting wrong - and makes it more difficult to stay out of the way and let the Reiki do what it needs to do.
3) Latest single source white western who has exclusivity to some ellusive Japanese hermit type figure?I think the majority of Reiki practitioners who have been around for a few years have become more discerning about who to "believe" when they come forward with "original Reiki teachings/students". Since Lama Yeshe (Richard Blackwell), who managed to pull the wool over the eyes of many respected Reiki teachers with what turned out to be channelled material,in particular, many people have naturally been more wary of originality claims. Like Richard Blackwell, many of these other "single sources" claim to be being taught by students of Mikao Usui but are unwilling/unable to produce any documentary evidence of either the fact that they are being taught (certificates, which are usually issued after achieving certain stages in the teaching of most arts and practices in Japan - not only Reiki) or photographs of their teacher or their classes/other students (or in at least one case the actual proper name of their teacher!). In the case of those teachers who claim to teach what Usui taught before he came up with Usui Reiki Ryoho then they are not teaching Usui Reiki Ryoho as we understand it and it is up to their students to decide what they are being taught is useful and helpful for them.
4) The best marketed 'Japanese' styles, no matter how far away goals seem? Well, this depends on what your goal is! If you want to learn all there is to know about Reiki and exactly what it was that Mikao Usui (or Chujiro Hayashi or even Hawayo Takata) taught then the goal is very far away and is most likely unreachable unless you could go back in time and attend one of their classes in person!
There are no short cuts to Reiki - only practice and more practice. In my opinion, the beauty of the Japanese approach, is its simplicity and lack of unnecessary dogma and techniques, which makes it easier for the student to focus on practicing Reiki rather than worrying about lots of extra things that the teacher has added-in.
In Japan, becoming a Master in any art or practice is a lifelong journey, so the goal of becoming a true master is always "far away" for most of us. We can, however, learn to become good teachers for our students by helping them on their journey to mastership by keeping what we teach free of unnecessary clutter. What actually is "unecessary clutter" is of course up to the teacher!