Discussions here and in another place have led me to question what I am actually doing when I say "I do Reiki".
I describe myself as a Reiki Master and Spiritual Healer, and view the two as being fundamentally different, with Reiki involving attunement to the Reiki and Spiritual Healing involving attunement to the client before invoking the healing energies. Yet I am now being told that the boundaries are blurred and I can't see how.
I don't follow the traditional Japanese Reiki, with the Japanese names for techniques, and the strict forms, hand positions - except when I'm teaching people, of course! I believe that I am not Japanese and I don't have the cultural background that Japanese people have, so I don't follow what is being described as "traditional", or "Japanese", or even "true" Reiki.
I come to Reiki from a Western, vaguely Christian metaphysical background, with my own spirituality and teachers. So when the Reiki principles tell me to "honour my teachers" I honour both Usui, Hayashi and Hawayo Takata but I also honour my spiritual healing teachers and my religious teachers.
Can what I'm doing still be described as Reiki? I am convinced that I give Reiki when I intend to give Reiki, and spiritual healing when I intend to give spiritual healing, but am I mistaken?
I'm not looking for yes/no answers here, I'm looking for a discussion about what I'm going through!
Last edited by Pandora on Sat May 09, 2009 11:18 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : remembered Mrs Takata's name at last!)