hiya bro
some initial thoguhts on the trail of these deep questions :
Milarepa wrote:In the notes attributed to Harue Kanemitsu, a level 2 student of Takata sensei, Takata sensei is said to have spoke in-course ' She said we would never lose our healing power, except if we were to try and teach REIKI to another.....'.
teaching reiki means teaching how to teach reiki (i.e. master level) or just teaching how to do reiki (levels one and two ) ? i feel she was alluding to master level by saying those words
and assuming that she meant master level, my thoughts follow as under :
Wayne wrote:
There's a trend among some Reiki folk not to train more than a couple of Master students. I used to think this is prob cause of 'quality control'. Perhaps there's another reason, maybe one that's been passed on innocently now, that even some practitioners aren't aware of?
What would happen if one lost their Reiki healing power might depend on just what exactly Reiki is.
we have tons of debates on what reiki is
and have a great reservoir of opinions about that... our explanation of the sentiment that we lose reiki healing power, will run along a particular opinion we pick out from this big pool
what follows on this message is directly linked on how i personally comprehend about the nature of reiki
honestly speaking, the moment i separate reiki from connotations of being an 'energy', i feel less inertia to move along
reiki is innate to us ? might be like radio waves all around us, settalite waves, cellular waves, etc are also innate to us, but we cannot 'access' them since we dont have the receiving equipment...
the word 'innate' needs some more light... one thing is that we have something already 'within' us, and need to lower some barrier in order to access that... the second thing is that NO, the innate item is not 'within' us, rather we have an inactivated ability within us that could use and access something that is outside us...
the third thing (
) is that there is some outside ability or instruction code that we need to 'import' or 'embed' within us, in order to use and access something that was not possible without that... (the empahsis is that we are using something we had within us already, in contradistinction of the thing we are importing within us at the same time)...
Wayne wrote:
Assumptions that toe-the-line with our Reiki peers perhaps not being the wisest choice, neccessarily. Without further investigation.
may be a wise choice
at least! for want of any 'wisest' choice
Wayne wrote:
In certain initiatory procedures, consciousness is passed on. From teacher to initiate. And some do believe that this is the way Reiki works, in part. The other part being the consciousness recieved enables us to interact with our own divinity.
Is this unlimited? Maybe.
this discussion goes to the core of the 'nature' of initiation... the initiation at third degree, as far as i can understand, does the following :
..1... transfers the mandate from Usui to the initate
..2... creates an "id" or "account" of that person in lineage ladder
..3... hands down a certain figment of Usui's Consciousness to the initiate
..4... establish a connection direct with the source (may it be Usui, or further to the wisdom he was gifted with, or else? ) without the intervention of intermediate lineage holders
..5... transfers figments of individual consciousness of intermediate lineage holders to the initiate (the synergy effect too)
..6... makes the consciousness of the initiate 'available ' to the lineage holder upwards too, right to Usui himself
these could be just theories or could be facts or both... since we often come across situations where facts feed theories, which in return feed other facts
you might smell a Jung version in these thoughts, but i cant help myself
having said all this, it is evdient that we owe a great responsibility to the reiki community and public at large when we are initiating somebody to masters level, since we are transferring and conferring an ipso facto mandate to that new member of the lineage... if he does things unworthy of the philosophy of the founder, he dilutes/disturbs the whole lineage...
a sidenote : in various initiatory disciplines, the permission of the founder of the school is required before 'taking in' or 'sworning in' ceremony for a new member...i had some discussion with some buddies that in witchcraft and wicca community, the initiation is a very very sacred step, and it needs 'active' permission of the founder, obtained through inviisible means...
in shamanic circles too (perhaps Andy will make a nose-correction) the initiation ceremony has a great deal of 'pre-approvals'... but in reiki, we dont require any approvals from peers (living or dead) or from the founder himself...
do we take for granted that permission is inbuilt when we were ourselves initiated with DKM ?
this was the food for my thought to say something more on the question Wayne floated.. maybe tomorrow !
take care
salman